Description

ABSTRACT:
Northeast Asian countries have been engaged in disputes over history. While their historical contentions have caused suspicions and frictions among them, I argue that they have also served as a medium of dialogue that helps establish a common understanding about the individual countries’ contemporary reality and future direction. Historical contentions contribute to such a dialogue if and only if two conditions are met: regional actors recognize each other as legitimate participants in a dialogue about the salient past; and they contend over the past within a common framework of meaning. In the immediate post-war period, the region’s order began as a collection of parallel national spheres where the region’s actors remained within a common framework but without recognizing others’ legitimacy. Northeast Asia, through historical contentions in the 1980s and 1990s, produced an embryonic form of a regional public sphere that made possible transnational communications about the region’s future and each nation’s desires, but it now stands at a fork between strengthening the regional public sphere and fracturing it into a contentious regional sphere.

BIO:
J.J. Suh is Associate Professor and Director of Korea Studies Program at SAIS, Johns Hopkins University. He received PhD in Political Science from University of Pennsylvania and taught at Cornell University. His publications include Power, Interest and Identity in Military Alliances (2007), Rethinking Security in East Asia (2004, co-edited with Peter Katzenstein and Allen Carlson), and numerous articles on military balance on Korea, U.S. policies toward Korea and Asia, U.S.-Korea relationship, and inter-Korea relationship. He is currently engaged in research on how “history wars” have shaped the regional order in Northeast Asia and will affect its future course, and editing a volume on North Korea.